D3/eticlopride
Group ID Model TM backbone RMSD Fraction TM superimposed ECL2 backbone RMSD Protein Z-score Pocket residue RMSD TM pocket residue RMSD TM2 rotation Fraction predicted pocket area Ligand heavy atom RMSD Atom residue contacts Contact strength Ligand Z-score
PompeuFabra 3 1.38 (205) 63 % (0.52) 2.87 (15) 1 1.5 (15) 1.16 (14) 0., 0. 63.0 % 0.96 36 (9) / 65 (15) 39.95 (58 %) 2.39
CDD-CMBI 1 1.95 (205) 66 % (0.66) 4.38 (15) -0.2 2.25 (15) 1.67 (14) 0., 0. 50.0 % 2.13 36 (12) / 65 (15) 38.75 (57 %) 2.05
COH-Vaidehi 1 1.58 (205) 69 % (0.79) 4.11 (15) 0.36 2.04 (15) 1.36 (14) 0., 0. 59.0 % 1.22 31 (10) / 65 (15) 34.78 (51 %) 2
UCSF-Shoichet-1 4 1.45 (205) 65 % (0.6) 3.53 (15) 0.71 1.53 (15) 1.41 (14) 0., 0. 74.0 % 1.23 29 (10) / 65 (15) 32.46 (47 %) 1.85
Schrödinger 5 1.41 (205) 60 % (0.53) 12.57 (15) -2.14 1.57 (15) 1.48 (14) 0., 0. 38.0 % 1.77 23 (11) / 65 (15) 30.94 (45 %) 1.63
CDD-CMBI 2 1.95 (205) 67 % (0.66) 4.38 (15) -0.2 2.24 (15) 1.67 (14) 0., 0. 46.0 % 2.27 26 (11) / 65 (15) 30.5 (44 %) 1.49
CDD-CMBI 3 1.95 (205) 66 % (0.65) 4.35 (15) -0.19 2.17 (15) 1.59 (14) 0., 0. 43.0 % 2.38 30 (11) / 65 (15) 30.1 (44 %) 1.44
Warsaw 4 2.13 (205) 62 % (0.64) 4.71 (15) -0.53 1.68 (15) 1.64 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 2.34 27 (9) / 65 (15) 26.47 (39 %) 1.22
CDD-CMBI 4 1.94 (205) 67 % (0.66) 4.17 (15) -0.12 1.99 (15) 1.62 (14) 0., 0. 35.0 % 2.13 19 (8) / 65 (15) 24.84 (36 %) 1.16
CDD-CMBI 5 1.94 (205) 67 % (0.67) 4. (15) -0.07 1.87 (15) 1.67 (14) 0., 0. 41.0 % 2.44 21 (8) / 65 (15) 25.57 (37 %) 1.14
Helsinki-Xhaard 1 1.55 (205) 67 % (0.67) 3.74 (15) 0.51 1.43 (15) 1.29 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 3.42 21 (7) / 65 (15) 28.95 (42 %) 1.13
COH-Vaidehi 2 1.57 (205) 70 % (0.8) 4.01 (15) 0.4 2.16 (15) 1.5 (14) 0., 0. 57.0 % 2.96 25 (7) / 65 (15) 26.75 (39 %) 1.1
Monash-Sexton-2 3 1.61 (205) 63 % (0.62) 4.81 (15) 0.09 2.47 (15) 2.3 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 1.94 17 (6) / 65 (15) 22.51 (33 %) 1.05
Schrödinger 1 1.43 (205) 63 % (0.55) 3.62 (6) ND 1.5 (15) 1.42 (14) 0., 0. 61.0 % 2.24 19 (10) / 65 (15) 22.81 (33 %) 1.01
Monash-Hall 3 1.38 (205) 63 % (0.55) 3.33 (15) 0.87 2.4 (15) 2.05 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 2.1 18 (10) / 65 (15) 22.05 (32 %) 0.99
UNC 5 2.56 (205) 63 % (0.65) 3.8 (15) -0.79 1.77 (15) 1.7 (14) 0., 0. 58.0 % 3.25 20 (6) / 65 (15) 24.28 (35 %) 0.87
COH-Vaidehi 3 1.55 (205) 71 % (0.81) 4.06 (15) 0.4 2.03 (15) 1.43 (14) 0., 0. 59.0 % 2.5 18 (8) / 65 (15) 21.43 (31 %) 0.86
Monash-Yuriev 3 1.53 (205) 62 % (0.54) 5.01 (15) 0.13 2.38 (15) 1.72 (14) 0., 0. 55.0 % 2.33 20 (8) / 65 (15) 20.81 (30 %) 0.86
Monash-Hall 1 1.39 (205) 61 % (0.52) 3.07 (15) 0.93 2.18 (15) 2.04 (14) 0., 0. 35.0 % 2.21 16 (11) / 65 (15) 19.68 (29 %) 0.81
Schrödinger 2 1.44 (205) 62 % (0.54) 3.57 (6) ND 1.87 (15) 1.85 (14) 0., 0. 61.0 % 2.68 17 (8) / 65 (15) 20.08 (29 %) 0.73
UCSF-Shoichet-1 1 2.25 (205) 65 % (0.88) 8.88 (15) -2.03 2.17 (15) 1.96 (14) 0., 0. 68.0 % 2.39 17 (6) / 65 (15) 18.79 (27 %) 0.71
UMich-Zhang 1 1.5 (205) 65 % (0.7) 3.35 (15) 0.71 2.01 (15) 1.93 (14) 0., 0. 53.0 % 3.42 17 (5) / 65 (15) 22.32 (33 %) 0.71
Monash-Hall 2 1.35 (205) 61 % (0.53) 3.64 (15) 0.79 2.62 (15) 2.08 (14) 0., 0. 34.0 % 2.16 13 (9) / 65 (15) 17.85 (26 %) 0.7
Monash-Sexton-2 2 1.37 (205) 63 % (0.57) 3.31 (15) 0.88 2.19 (15) 2.06 (14) 0., 0. 53.0 % 2.98 16 (6) / 65 (15) 20.1 (29 %) 0.67
QUB 4 1.71 (205) 64 % (0.62) 4.45 (15) 0.08 1.76 (15) 1.66 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 3.29 17 (6) / 65 (15) 21.08 (31 %) 0.66
Soochow 1 2.33 (205) 62 % (0.66) 4.14 (15) -0.61 1.69 (15) 1.63 (14) 0., 0. 45.0 % 2.24 16 (6) / 65 (15) 16.96 (25 %) 0.63
Soochow 1 2.33 (205) 62 % (0.66) 4.14 (15) -0.61 1.69 (15) 1.63 (14) 0., 0. 45.0 % 2.24 16 (6) / 65 (15) 16.96 (25 %) 0.63
Monash-Hall 4 1.39 (205) 61 % (0.53) 2.72 (15) 1.04 2.15 (15) 2.11 (14) 0., 0. 41.0 % 2.09 9 (8) / 65 (15) 16.17 (24 %) 0.61
Stockholm 2 1.7 (205) 66 % (0.66) 5.55 (15) -0.26 1.54 (15) 1.58 (14) 0., 0. 53.0 % 2.98 11 (7) / 65 (15) 18.01 (26 %) 0.53
UNM 1 1.39 (205) 66 % (0.58) 3.47 (15) 0.8 1.57 (15) 1.46 (14) 0., 0. 51.0 % 3.58 17 (5) / 65 (15) 19.29 (28 %) 0.48
UNM 2 1.39 (205) 66 % (0.58) 3.47 (15) 0.8 1.57 (15) 1.46 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 4.33 22 (6) / 65 (15) 21.15 (31 %) 0.43
GaTech 2 1.88 (205) 69 % (0.89) 3.06 (15) 0.31 3.05 (15) 3.09 (14) 0., 0. 56.0 % 2.18 11 (7) / 65 (15) 13.33 (19 %) 0.41
Stockholm 3 1.56 (205) 67 % (0.66) 4.89 (15) 0.13 1.54 (15) 1.57 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 2.84 11 (4) / 65 (15) 15.03 (22 %) 0.37
UNC 3 2.55 (205) 62 % (0.61) 7.3 (15) -1.9 1.79 (15) 1.73 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 3.05 12 (4) / 65 (15) 15.58 (23 %) 0.36
WUStL 2 1.37 (205) 70 % (0.75) 2.72 (15) 1.07 1.51 (15) 1.5 (14) 0., 0. 60.0 % 3.11 12 (5) / 65 (15) 15.67 (23 %) 0.35
UMich-Zhang 2 1.5 (205) 65 % (0.7) 4.09 (15) 0.47 2.31 (15) 1.9 (14) 0., 0. 53.0 % 4.22 18 (6) / 65 (15) 19.53 (28 %) 0.35
Evotec 1 2.38 (205) 74 % (1.17) 4.96 (15) -0.93 2.76 (15) 2.79 (14) 0., 0. 43.0 % 3.94 16 (6) / 65 (15) 18.48 (27 %) 0.35
Caltech 4 2.22 (205) 64 % (1.) 5.24 (15) -0.82 2.89 (15) 2.79 (14) 0., 0. 76.0 % 3.45 11 (2) / 65 (15) 16.52 (24 %) 0.33
UNSW 2 1.55 (205) 65 % (0.57) 4.8 (15) 0.18 1.68 (15) 1.59 (14) 0., 0. 63.0 % 3.68 14 (4) / 65 (15) 17.1 (25 %) 0.32
UNSW 1 1.55 (205) 65 % (0.57) 4.8 (15) 0.18 1.64 (15) 1.58 (14) 0., 0. 58.0 % 4.07 18 (5) / 65 (15) 18.34 (27 %) 0.31
UMich-Lomize 1 1.45 (205) 63 % (0.58) 3.63 (15) 0.68 1.62 (15) 1.49 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 3.26 9 (5) / 65 (15) 14.53 (21 %) 0.25
UMich-Pogozheva 1 1.45 (205) 63 % (0.58) 3.63 (15) 0.68 1.62 (15) 1.49 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 3.26 9 (5) / 65 (15) 14.53 (21 %) 0.25
Monash-Yuriev 5 1.48 (205) 63 % (0.56) 4.9 (15) 0.23 2.21 (15) 1.55 (14) 0., 0. 49.0 % 3.46 15 (5) / 65 (15) 15.19 (22 %) 0.24
Monash-Yuriev 1 1.49 (205) 63 % (0.56) 4.98 (15) 0.2 2.36 (15) 1.74 (14) 0., 0. 51.0 % 2.95 11 (4) / 65 (15) 13.11 (19 %) 0.22
UCSF-Shoichet-1 2 1.52 (205) 65 % (0.63) 5.57 (15) -0.04 1.55 (15) 1.47 (14) 0., 0. 60.0 % 3.3 14 (5) / 65 (15) 14.24 (21 %) 0.22
Stockholm 1 1.7 (205) 66 % (0.66) 5.55 (15) -0.26 1.54 (15) 1.58 (14) 0., 0. 53.0 % 3.11 7 (3) / 65 (15) 13.53 (20 %) 0.22
GaTech 1 1.88 (205) 69 % (0.89) 3.06 (15) 0.31 3.05 (15) 3.09 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 2.62 9 (4) / 65 (15) 11.43 (17 %) 0.19
UNC 2 2.55 (205) 62 % (0.61) 7.3 (15) -1.9 1.81 (15) 1.76 (14) 0., 0. 40.0 % 3.84 13 (5) / 65 (15) 15.65 (23 %) 0.19
WUStL 1 1.44 (205) 70 % (0.78) 3.11 (15) 0.86 1.65 (15) 1.43 (14) 0., 0. 71.0 % 3.85 15 (3) / 65 (15) 15.42 (22 %) 0.17
UCSF-Shoichet-1 5 1.9 (205) 68 % (1.05) 7.94 (15) -1.28 1.75 (15) 1.63 (14) 0., 0. 62.0 % 3.41 11 (4) / 65 (15) 13.77 (20 %) 0.16
QUB 1 1.72 (205) 64 % (0.63) 4.46 (15) 0.07 1.93 (15) 1.74 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 4.19 12 (4) / 65 (15) 16.3 (24 %) 0.15
UNM 3 1.45 (205) 66 % (0.57) 3.34 (15) 0.77 1.59 (15) 1.48 (14) 0., 0. 53.0 % 4.93 18 (6) / 65 (15) 18.82 (27 %) 0.15
Monash-Yuriev 2 1.55 (205) 64 % (0.64) 4.78 (15) 0.18 2.26 (15) 1.53 (14) 0., 0. 45.0 % 3.44 11 (5) / 65 (15) 13.34 (19 %) 0.13
UMich-Zhang 3 1.26 (205) 74 % (0.81) 5.54 (15) 0.31 3.1 (15) 1.99 (14) 0., 0. 70.0 % 4.47 12 (5) / 65 (15) 16.64 (24 %) 0.11
PompeuFabra 2 1.38 (205) 65 % (0.56) 3.01 (15) 0.96 1.38 (15) 1.24 (14) 0., 0. 61.0 % 3.4 11 (3) / 65 (15) 12.88 (19 %) 0.11
QUB 5 1.73 (205) 64 % (0.62) 4.54 (15) 0.03 1.91 (15) 1.8 (14) 0., 0. 44.0 % 3.81 10 (4) / 65 (15) 14.24 (21 %) 0.11
Evotec 5 2.38 (205) 74 % (1.17) 4.96 (15) -0.93 2.76 (15) 2.79 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 3.91 14 (6) / 65 (15) 14.35 (21 %) 0.09
Schrödinger 4 1.44 (205) 62 % (0.54) 3.57 (6) ND 1.87 (15) 1.85 (14) 0., 0. 61.0 % 3.53 11 (4) / 65 (15) 13. (19 %) 0.09
GaTech 3 1.88 (205) 69 % (0.89) 3.06 (15) 0.31 3.05 (15) 3.09 (14) 0., 0. 57.0 % 2.41 7 (4) / 65 (15) 8.85 (13 %) 0.07
PompeuFabra 1 1.38 (205) 65 % (0.56) 3. (15) 0.97 1.45 (15) 1.33 (14) 0., 0. 50.0 % 3.62 10 (4) / 65 (15) 12.44 (18 %) 0.03
Evotec 3 2.38 (205) 74 % (1.17) 4.96 (15) -0.93 2.76 (15) 2.79 (14) 0., 0. 44.0 % 3.84 12 (5) / 65 (15) 12.97 (19 %) 0.02
Caltech 2 1.77 (205) 77 % (1.12) 4.63 (15) -0.05 2.64 (15) 2.12 (14) 0., 0. 81.0 % 4.13 10 (2) / 65 (15) 13.54 (20 %) -0.01
WUStL 3 1.35 (205) 72 % (0.76) 2.69 (15) 1.11 1.57 (15) 1.57 (14) 0., 0. 74.0 % 4.55 15 (6) / 65 (15) 14.76 (22 %) -0.03
Monash-Sexton-2 5 1.61 (205) 61 % (0.56) 6.4 (15) -0.41 2.48 (15) 2.19 (14) 0., 0. 54.0 % 3.89 10 (7) / 65 (15) 12.11 (18 %) -0.05
UMich-Zhang 4 1.44 (205) 66 % (0.65) 3.74 (15) 0.65 2.51 (15) 1.87 (14) 0., 0. 65.0 % 4.28 12 (4) / 65 (15) 13.07 (19 %) -0.07
KIAS 5 1.41 (205) 64 % (0.58) 3.66 (15) 0.72 2.17 (15) 1.59 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 3.51 6 (5) / 65 (15) 10.37 (15 %) -0.08
Schrödinger 3 1.43 (205) 63 % (0.55) 3.62 (6) ND 1.5 (15) 1.42 (14) 0., 0. 61.0 % 3.71 10 (3) / 65 (15) 10.91 (16 %) -0.09
QUB 3 1.71 (205) 65 % (0.64) 4.56 (15) 0.04 1.86 (15) 1.64 (14) 0., 0. 65.0 % 5.24 12 (5) / 65 (15) 15.8 (23 %) -0.11
KIAS 1 1.51 (205) 63 % (0.71) 3.14 (15) 0.75 2.83 (15) 2.32 (14) 0., 0. 43.0 % 3.94 6 (3) / 65 (15) 11.02 (16 %) -0.13
COH-Vaidehi 5 2.7 (205) 41 % (1.33) 4.37 (15) -1.15 2.79 (15) 2.57 (14) 0., 0. 48.0 % 4.09 10 (4) / 65 (15) 11.01 (16 %) -0.16
Monash-Hall 5 1.37 (205) 65 % (0.57) 3.44 (15) 0.84 2.16 (15) 1.44 (14) 0., 0. 64.0 % 3.64 5 (4) / 65 (15) 9.37 (14 %) -0.17
Evotec 2 2.38 (205) 74 % (1.17) 4.96 (15) -0.93 2.76 (15) 2.79 (14) 0., 0. 45.0 % 4.6 11 (4) / 65 (15) 12.43 (18 %) -0.19
Caltech 3 2.39 (205) 66 % (1.22) 4.66 (15) -0.85 2.88 (15) 2.91 (14) 0., 0. 60.0 % 4.25 10 (2) / 65 (15) 11.02 (16 %) -0.2
Caltech 1 1.97 (205) 68 % (1.04) 3.99 (15) -0.1 3.07 (15) 2.43 (14) 0., 0. 74.0 % 5.68 13 (3) / 65 (15) 15.47 (23 %) -0.23
RHUL 2 1.7 (205) 65 % (0.59) 2.75 (15) 0.64 1.69 (15) 1.18 (14) 0., 0. 43.0 % 3.85 6 (4) / 65 (15) 8.87 (13 %) -0.25
Monash-Yuriev 4 1.48 (205) 62 % (0.55) 4.96 (15) 0.21 2.31 (15) 1.67 (14) 0., 0. 46.0 % 3.98 8 (3) / 65 (15) 8.88 (13 %) -0.27
GaTech 5 1.88 (205) 69 % (0.89) 3.06 (15) 0.31 3.05 (15) 3.09 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 3.65 5 (3) / 65 (15) 7.75 (11 %) -0.28
PharmaDesign 1 1.51 (205) 64 % (0.56) 3.72 (15) 0.58 2.14 (15) 1.78 (14) 0., 0. 41.0 % 4.83 11 (3) / 65 (15) 10.99 (16 %) -0.33
Evotec 4 2.38 (205) 74 % (1.17) 4.96 (15) -0.93 2.75 (15) 2.78 (14) 0., 0. 45.0 % 4.29 7 (2) / 65 (15) 8.73 (13 %) -0.36
COH-Vaidehi 4 2.68 (205) 41 % (1.35) 4.37 (15) -1.13 2.77 (15) 2.54 (14) 0., 0. 56.0 % 5.69 13 (3) / 65 (15) 13.33 (19 %) -0.37
Monash-Sexton-2 4 1.56 (205) 60 % (0.55) 5.18 (15) 0.04 2.08 (15) 1.87 (14) 0., 0. 42.0 % 4.28 8 (3) / 65 (15) 7.62 (11 %) -0.42
GaTech 4 1.88 (205) 69 % (0.89) 3.06 (15) 0.31 3.05 (15) 3.09 (14) 0., 0. 60.0 % 3.42 2 (1) / 65 (15) 3.84 (6 %) -0.47
QUB 2 1.73 (205) 63 % (0.62) 4.49 (15) 0.04 1.89 (15) 1.72 (14) 0., 0. 48.0 % 5.86 10 (3) / 65 (15) 12.01 (18 %) -0.49
Monash-Sexton-2 1 1.63 (205) 64 % (0.69) 4.35 (15) 0.21 2.27 (15) 1.98 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 5.19 9 (2) / 65 (15) 9.57 (14 %) -0.5
UMich-Zhang 5 1.46 (205) 66 % (0.65) 3.47 (15) 0.72 2.76 (15) 2.26 (14) 0., 0. 74.0 % 7.18 13 (3) / 65 (15) 13.67 (20 %) -0.68
KIAS 3 1.48 (205) 63 % (0.63) 3. (15) 0.85 2.72 (15) 2.17 (14) 0., 0. 48.0 % 5.88 9 (5) / 65 (15) 9.07 (13 %) -0.69
UNM 5 1.46 (205) 65 % (0.57) 3.34 (15) 0.76 1.49 (15) 1.41 (14) 0., 0. 38.0 % 6.99 7 (4) / 65 (15) 11.57 (17 %) -0.77
UNSW 5 1.63 (205) 65 % (0.6) 3.63 (15) 0.45 1.74 (15) 1.51 (14) 0., 0. 40.0 % 6.83 8 (2) / 65 (15) 9.72 (14 %) -0.86
Baylor-Barth 3 1.71 (205) 67 % (0.67) 3.42 (15) 0.41 2.13 (15) 1.81 (14) 0., 0. 36.0 % 5.77 3 (1) / 65 (15) 5.44 (8 %) -0.9
UNC 1 2.56 (205) 63 % (0.65) 3.8 (15) -0.79 1.79 (15) 1.72 (14) 0., 0. 43.0 % 6.53 5 (3) / 65 (15) 7.46 (11 %) -0.93
UCSF-Shoichet-1 3 1.98 (205) 66 % (0.85) 8.16 (15) -1.46 2.2 (15) 1.94 (14) 0., 0. 73.0 % 8.01 10 (1) / 65 (15) 11.68 (17 %) -0.99
UNC 4 2.56 (205) 63 % (0.65) 3.8 (15) -0.79 1.76 (15) 1.69 (14) 0., 0. 60.0 % 6.6 4 (1) / 65 (15) 5.86 (9 %) -1.05
Baylor-Barth 2 1.65 (205) 67 % (0.55) 5.05 (15) -0.04 2.1 (15) 1.66 (14) 0., 0. 30.0 % 5.7 2 (2) / 65 (15) 2.59 (4 %) -1.06
Stockholm 4 1.56 (205) 67 % (0.66) 7.39 (15) -0.67 1.91 (15) 1.57 (14) 0., 0. 35.0 % 5.74 1 (1) / 65 (15) 2.48 (4 %) -1.08
Caltech 5 2.04 (205) 66 % (0.94) 5.79 (15) -0.77 2.98 (15) 2.87 (14) 0., 0. 62.0 % 7.23 8 (2) / 65 (15) 7.65 (11 %) -1.08
RHUL 1 1.7 (205) 65 % (0.59) 2.75 (15) 0.64 1.69 (15) 1.18 (14) 0., 0. 45.0 % 6.75 5 (3) / 65 (15) 5.69 (8 %) -1.1
Stockholm 5 1.58 (205) 66 % (0.58) 3.92 (15) 0.41 1.61 (15) 1.58 (14) 0., 0. 57.0 % 7.45 5 (2) / 65 (15) 6.69 (10 %) -1.19
Warsaw 5 2.13 (205) 62 % (0.64) 4.71 (15) -0.53 1.68 (15) 1.64 (14) 0., 0. 55.0 % 7.65 8 (2) / 65 (15) 7.08 (10 %) -1.21
Warsaw 1 2.13 (205) 62 % (0.64) 4.71 (15) -0.53 1.68 (15) 1.64 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 7.66 7 (3) / 65 (15) 6.99 (10 %) -1.22
UNSW 4 1.43 (205) 62 % (0.57) 3.93 (15) 0.6 1.65 (15) 1.59 (14) 0., 0. 48.0 % 7.99 8 (1) / 65 (15) 7.75 (11 %) -1.24
UNM 4 1.39 (205) 66 % (0.59) 3.46 (15) 0.8 1.61 (15) 1.5 (14) 0., 0. 60.0 % 8.79 9 (3) / 65 (15) 10.41 (15 %) -1.25
Warsaw 2 2.13 (205) 62 % (0.64) 4.71 (15) -0.53 1.68 (15) 1.64 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 7.78 7 (3) / 65 (15) 6.56 (10 %) -1.27
UNSW 3 1.43 (205) 62 % (0.57) 3.93 (15) 0.6 1.62 (15) 1.56 (14) 0., 0. 51.0 % 8.63 9 (4) / 65 (15) 9.36 (14 %) -1.28
Warsaw 3 2.13 (205) 62 % (0.64) 4.71 (15) -0.53 1.68 (15) 1.64 (14) 0., 0. 52.0 % 7.84 5 (3) / 65 (15) 6.44 (9 %) -1.29
Baylor-Barth 1 1.75 (205) 64 % (0.75) 3.77 (15) 0.24 2.17 (15) 1.92 (14) 0., 0. 41.0 % 7.5 3 (2) / 65 (15) 3.24 (5 %) -1.42
KIAS 2 1.49 (205) 63 % (0.71) 2.97 (15) 0.84 2.85 (15) 2.39 (14) 0., 0. 39.0 % 7.47 2 (2) / 65 (15) 2.32 (3 %) -1.47
KIAS 4 1.56 (205) 63 % (0.61) 3.96 (15) 0.43 2.84 (15) 2.49 (14) 0., 0. 47.0 % 7.64 3 (2) / 65 (15) 2.66 (4 %) -1.49
Baylor-Barth 4 1.74 (205) 64 % (0.72) 4.14 (15) 0.14 2.52 (15) 2.33 (14) 0., 0. 46.0 % 7.96 2 (1) / 65 (15) 2.35 (3 %) -1.58
Strasbourg 1 3.04 (205) 60 % (1.32) 7.83 (15) -2.7 2.42 (15) 2.33 (14) 0., 0. 72.0 % 10.08 8 (2) / 65 (15) 9.08 (13 %) -1.62
Strasbourg 2 2.99 (205) 64 % (1.26) 8.87 (15) -2.97 2.67 (15) 2.49 (14) 0., 0. 69.0 % 9.94 8 (2) / 65 (15) 7.74 (11 %) -1.68
RHUL 4 1.7 (205) 65 % (0.59) 2.75 (15) 0.64 1.69 (15) 1.18 (14) 0., 0. 12.0 % 14.56 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -3.2
RHUL 5 1.7 (205) 65 % (0.59) 2.75 (15) 0.64 1.69 (15) 1.18 (14) 0., 0. 2.0 % 15.38 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0.2 (0 %) -3.37
RHUL 3 1.7 (205) 65 % (0.59) 2.75 (15) 0.64 1.69 (15) 1.18 (14) 0., 0. 2.0 % 15.6 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -3.43
LenServer 2 20.48 (205) 5 % (1.59) 10.57 (15) -25.77 21.39 (15) 21.97 (14) 0., 0. 0.0 % 17.69 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -3.9
LenServer 3 20.47 (205) 5 % (1.58) 10.57 (15) -25.76 21.26 (15) 21.85 (14) 0., 0. 0.0 % 19.88 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -4.39
LenServer 5 20.33 (205) 9 % (1.47) 10.82 (15) -25.67 21.46 (15) 22. (14) 0., 0. 0.0 % 21.23 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -4.69
LenServer 4 20.35 (205) 9 % (1.48) 10.81 (15) -25.68 21.48 (15) 22.02 (14) 0., 0. 0.0 % 21.37 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -4.72
LenServer 1 20.34 (205) 9 % (1.47) 10.81 (15) -25.68 21.4 (15) 21.94 (14) 0., 0. 0.0 % 21.94 0 (0) / 65 (15) 0. (0 %) -4.84